- The Introduction stage: introduces the theme, provides background information, defines the context, roles and key vocabulary involved in the task.
- The Task/Question - explains clearly and precisely the task learners have to complete and how they will accomplish it. It is expected that the task will be interesting and motivating.
- The Process stage guides the learners through a set of activities and research tasks, using a set of predefined resources.
- The Evaluation: involves learners in self-evaluation, comparing and contrasting what they have produced with other learners and giving feedback on what they feel they have learnt, achieved
The Question/Task
A good WebQuest always has a clear question or task easy for learners to understand and follow to a logical conclusion. In this WebQuest, learners are provided with clear topical areas to focus on and a step by step procedure of how they will come up with the components of the final product.
From the BBC News Archives, choose two important news stories from 2004 for each of these categories (group work): health, politics, crime, space exploration, business and sport
- Present a short summary of your news stories to the newspaper Editorial Board. They will help you decide on the most important story for each category (group work).
- Write short articles about your final six news stories, and include graphics (individual work).
- Edit and produce The Year 2004 magazine. Show your magazine to other groups (group work)
- Do a questionnaire self-evaluation of your work (individual work).
This demonstrates that careful thought was put into the crafting of the task to yield the intended outcome.
Background for Everyone
To tap into the learners' background knowledge, the task asks them to firstly reflect on what made interesting news to each of them as individuals before they surf the BBC Website to refresh their memories. This is important because it helps learners, not only tap into their own background knowledge but also examine and realign their interests to choose a suitable partner. Weblinks are then provided as resources to use in completing the task.
Roles/Expertise
The task asks the participants to assume the role of a 'group of reporters' who work in teams of three to reproduce news articles of hot news stories of the year. after writing the stories, the reporters are to submit their products to another team called the "Editorial Board.' There is a clear and distinctive definition of roles that arrays fears of conflict of interest. Further, each team of reporters has a specific topic to concentrate on according to their interests to avoid overlap in duties.
Use of The Web
Using the Web is in the DNA of a WebQuest thus a task that does not fully utilise this resource defeats the whole purpose. In this particular quest, learners made use of the BBC Website for both archived and recent information to help them complete the task.
Transformative Thinking
This is the best part of this WebQuest as higher-order thinking skills were engaged from the beginning. Firstly, they had to reflect on events of the year and remember particular ones that stood out from their individual perspectives which later culminated in decision making - settling on topical areas from those provided. Secondly, participants had to find others with aligned interests, express their views and decide to form working partnerships. It is possible some of them may have wanted to partner with close friends, but they had to examine and put aside personal inclinations for the good of the mission. Higher-order skills of reflection, brainstorming, analysis and synthesis were tapped into by the task.
Real-World Feedback
The WebQuest task has two forms of feedback that I found very interesting: News Verification and Self Evaluation. In news verification, learners were tasked to ensure that all contents of their respective articles were derived from authentic sources provided as a real-life journalism ethic. This would help build a foundation for ethical reporting in future. In the second part, learners were provided with a self-evaluation questionnaire to reflect on the task in terms of experiences, perceptions of group work (before, during and after the task), lessons they picked from the task and what they would like to improve on in the future. Above all, they were provided with the rubric of how their product would be assessed.
Conclusion
Overall, the WebQuest had a holistic tough to it as it involved all four language skills: listening, speaking, reading and writing, and completed individually in part and through groups. The task was highly engaging and activated higher-order thinking skills and roles clearly shared with distinctive boundaries. All components of the WebQuest as stipulated by the inventor were complied with. However, the task may not have been very appropriate for learners who learn better as individuals than in groups as it required a lot of teamwork and collaboration.
If you wish to develop research and other higher-order skills in the learners, try WebQuest. Let me know what your views on this topic by commenting below.
For more information, visit WebQuest.Org or
George, since I like learning about WebQuests, it's always lovely to read posts about the tool. Do you think you can utilise this in your context? I like the points of the tool that students need to engage in higher order thinking, but in my context where is more teacher-centred and students just memorise what they learn, this will be quite new. So I might need to have an induction session if I decide to use this in classroom. Thank you for the detailed explanation!
ReplyDeleteThis is a comprehensive review of WebQuest. I particulary love the fact that WebQuest provides the learner with a task to do. This is a great way to improve learner autonomy. I wonder how this can be adapted in a low-resource context where access to the internet is not often possible.
ReplyDeleteGreat details, George.